Community perceptions of the problems associated with companion animals in Esperanza city, Santa Fe, Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/favecv.2024.23.e0032Keywords:
public health, companion animals, animal populations, perceptionsAbstract
Overpopulation and free-roaming animals in public spaces generate diverse impacts on animal welfare, biodiversity, and public health with the occurrence of zoonotic diseases, animal bites, and traffic accidents.
Programs to manage the problem must be designed, implemented, and adapted to each local reality. In that sense, the community's perception of the problem is a fundamental input that improves the chances of success of said programs.
To know the community's perceptions about free animals on public roads in the city of Esperanza (Santa Fe), an observational, transversal, and descriptive study was carried out in 2019. The inhabitants were questioned (N= 115) through a semi-structured survey.
The community considers free animals on streets as a relevant problem, including insecurity or environmental issues (62%). At the same time, zoonoses are not mentioned (2%) as having main impacts on public health. Individual actions along with those executed by the State are perceived as part of the solution (45.6%). However, it was observed that the perception of the existence of the problem is not associated with individual actions and attitudes aimed at avoiding it.
References
Beck A. 1975. The public health implications of urban dogs. American Journal of Public Health 2: 1315-1318. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.65.12.1315
Bergman DL, Breck SW, Bender SC. 2009. Dogs Gone Wild: Feral Dog Damage in the United States. Wildlife Damage Management Conference. EdJ.R. Boulanger. Navajo Nation. 9 pp.
Bir C, Croney CC, Widmar NJO. 2019. U.S. Residents’ Perceptions of Dogs, Their Welfare and Related Information Sources. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 1: 42-68. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476862
Dujardin JC, Herrera S, Do Rosario V, Arevalo J, Boelaert M, Carrasco HJ, Correa-Oliveira R, Garcia L, Gotuzzo E, Gyorkos TW, Kalergis AM, Kouri G, Larraga V, Lutumba P, Macias Garcia MA, Manrique-Saide PC, Modabber F, Nieto A, Pluschke G, Robello C, Rojas de Arias A, Rumbo M, Santos Preciado JI, Sundar S, Torres J, Torrico F, Van der Stuyft P, Victoir K, Olesen OF. 2010. Research priorities for neglected infectious diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean region. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 26: 4-14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000780
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation). 2011. Dog population management. Report of the FAO/WSPA/IZSAM expert meeting. Banna, Italy.
Hughes J, Macdonald DW. 2013. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation 57: 341-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005
Galetti M, Sazima I. 2006. Impact of feral dogs in an urban Atlanticforest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Nature & Conservation 4: 146-151.
International Companion Animal Management Coalition. 2019. Humane Dog Population Management. Disp. en: www.icam-coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ICAM-ManejoHumanitario-2020.06.21.pdf
Jessup DA. 2004. The welfare of feral cats and wildlife. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 225: 1377-1383. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1377.
Lunney M, Jones A, Stiles E, Waltner-Toews D. 2011. Assessing human-dog conflicts in Todos Santos, Guatemala: bite incidences and public perception. Prev. Vet. Med. 102: 315-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.07.017
Matter HC, Daniels TJ, Macpherson CN, Meslin FX, Wandeler A. 2000. Dog Ecology and Population Biology. Dogs, Zoonoses and Public Health 17-62. DOI:10.1079/9780851994369.0017
OMSA (Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal). 2017. World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface. Disp. en: www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Countryinformation/Animalpopulation
OMSA (Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal). 2022. (pp. 410- 423) Dog Population Management. OIE-Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris, France. Disp. en: https://rr-africa.woah.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/en_csatvol1-2022.pdf
Paolini A, Romagnoli S, Nardoia M, Conte A, Salini R, Podaliri Vulpiani M, Dalla Villa P. 2020. Study on the Public Perception of "Community-Owned Dogs" in the Abruzzo Region, Central Italy. Animals 10: 1227-1234. DOI: 10.3390/ani10071227.
Robertson II. 2000. The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses. Int. J. Parasitol. 30: 1369-1377. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00134-x.
Ruiz-Izaguirrea E, Eilers C. 2015. Perceptions of Village Dogs by Villagers and Tourists in the Coastal Region of Oxaca, Mexico. Anthrozoös: A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people and animals 25: 75-91. DOI: 10.2752/175303712X13240472427555.
Salamanca ZP, Polo LJ, Vargas J. 2011. Sobrepoblación canina y felina: tendencias y nuevas perspectivas. Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. 58: 45-53. Disp. en: www.redalyc.org/pdf/4076/407639226005.pdf
Slater MR. 2002. Community Approaches to Feral Cats: Problems, Alternatives and Recommendations. Ed. The Humane Society Press.
Slater MR, Di Nardo A, Pediconi O, Villa PD, Candeloro L, Alessandrini B, Del Papa S. 2008. Free-roaming dogs and cats in central Italy: public perceptions of the problem. Prev. Vet. Med. 84: 27-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.10.002
Tshering D, Tenzin T, Karma R, Waraphon P, De Garine-Wichatitsky M. 2020. Community Perceptions of Free-Roaming Dogs and Management Practices in Villages at the Periphery of a Protected Area in Bhutan. CMU J. Nat. Sci. 19: 130-150. DOI: 10.12982/CMUJNS.2020.00020
Twardek WM, Peiman KS, Gallagher AJ, Cooke SJ. 2017. Fido, Fluffy, and wildlife conservation: The environmental consequences of domesticated animals. Environmental Reviews 25: 381–395. DOI:10.1139/er-2016-0111
Villacé MB, López L, Amieva MJ, Belfiore S, Estario M, Acosta LD. 2018. Conocimientos, Percepción de Riesgo y Comportamientos en Relación con las Zoonosis en Adultos de la Ciudad de Córdoba. Revista Argentina de Salud Pública 9: 28-35. Disp. en: https://rasp.msal.gov.ar/index.php/rasp/issue/view/6/6.
Weng HY, Kass PH, Hart LA, Chomel BB. 2006. Risk factors for unsuccessful dog ownership: an epidemiologic study in Taiwan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006 77: 82-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.06.004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jaime Fernando CARMONA, Ana Inés MOLINERI, Marcelo Lisandro SIGNORINI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
FAVE Sección Ciencias Veterinarias ratifies the open access model, in which contents (in full) are available free to anyone in the internet. The costs of production and publication are not transfered to the authors. This policy intends to break social and economical barriers that generate inequities in the access to information, and for the publication of research results.
All articles can be accessed at http://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/FAVEveterinaria/issue/current/, under license Creative CommonsAtribución-NoComercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional.
