Validation of an animal welfare protocol on dairy goat farms

Authors

  • Victor Humberto Suarez National Agricultural Technology Institute image/svg+xml
  • Gabriela Marcela Martinez National Agricultural Technology Institute image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14409/favet.2025.1.e0046

Keywords:

dairy goats, animal welfare, assessment protocol, Argentina Northwest

Abstract

The purpose was to validate animal welfare indicators through an animal welfare assessment protocol in goat milk
farms under different production systems in the northwest (NOA) of Argentina. The study included 6 extensive farms and 5
semi-extensive farms with daytime grazing and nighttime confinement and 1 with total confinement, located in the regions of
arid canyon and valleys (n=7, QyVA) and temperate valleys and rain forest (n=5, VTyY). The protocol was divided into two parts,
one based on the observation of the environment conditions, nutritional, sanitary and milking management, animal behavior
and human-animal relationship. The second was based on the inspection of 20 ±5 goats in milking, recording the prevalence of
body condition, cleanliness degree,clinical signs and hoof trimming and dehorning. Each parameter received a partial score to
be summed to obtain the final total score, where those parameters observed directly by the evaluators were emphasized over those
recorded through the producer's report. The protocol was feasible since the implementation time was less than 2 hours and the
costs were low. The final average score of the farms was 64.4±17.4%, over the final optimum score, reaching the maximum in the
2
category of prevalence of individual clinical signs (87.2%) and the minimum in social interaction and contributions to wellbeing (28.1%). When analyzing by category of well-being, differences were only found between the extensive and semi-extensive
systems regarding environment conditions and comfort (X
2
4.3; p< 0.04) and environment and hygiene (X
2
7.0; p< 0.008),
where a greater number of semi-extensive systems exceeded the average score of the total farms compared to the extensive ones.
Regarding the prevalence of clinical signs, a trend was observed (X
2
3.08; p< 0.07) that a greater number of those flocks located
in the QyVA region exceeded the average score compared to those located in the VTyY, which presented a higher prevalence of
Famacha scores 4 and 5 and lameness. It is concluded that the selected set of management and animal-based measures was able
to discriminate the welfare of goats between farms in different regions and productive systems of the NOA

References

Anzuino K, Bell NJ, Bazeley KJ, Nicol CJ. 2010. Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms

based on direct observations. Vet. Rec. 167: 774-780. DOI: 10.1136/vr.c5892

AWIN. 2015. AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goats.DOI: 10 .13130/ AWIN goats 2015.

Barroso FG, Alados CL, Boza J. 2000. Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69 1: 35-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00113-1

Bartussek H, Leeb CH, Held S. 2000. Animal needs index for cattle. ANI 35 L/2000-cattle. Federal Research Institute for Agriculture. www.bal.bmlf.gv.at/index.php

Battini M, Stilwell G, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Canali E, Mattiello S. 2015. On-farm welfare assessment protocol for

adult dairy goats in intensive production systems. Animals (Basel) 5: 934-950. DOI: 10.3390/ani5040393

Battini M, Barbieri S, Vieira A, Stilwell G, Mattiello S. 2016. Results of testing the prototype of the AWIN welfare

assessment protocol for dairy goats in 30 intensive farms in Northern Italy, Italian Journal of Animal Science

15, 2: 283-293. DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1150795

Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. 2010. The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal wellbeing. Acta Agric. Scand. Anim. Sci., 60: 129-140. DOI:10.1080/09064702.2010.523480

11

Cabiddu A., Branca A, Decandia M, Pes A, Santucci PM, Masoero F, Calamari L. 1999. Relationship between body

con dition score, metabolic profile, milk yield and milk composition in goats browsing a Mediterranean

shrubland. Livestock Prod. Sci. 61: 267-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00076-7

Can E, Vieira A, Battini M, Mattiello S, Stilwell G. 2016. On-farm welfare assessment of dairy goat farms using

animal-based indicators: the example of 30 commercial farms in Portugal. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica

Section A - Animal Science. 66, 1: 43.55. DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2016.1208267

Can E, Vieira A, Battini M, Mattiello S, Stilwell G. 2017. Consistency over time of animal-based welfare indicators

as a further step for developing a welfare assessment monitoring scheme: The case of the Animal Welfare

Indicators protocol for dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 100: 9194-9204. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12825

Caroprese M, Napolitano F, Mattiello S, Fthenakis GC, Ribo O, Sevi A. 2015. On-farm welfare monitoring of small

ruminants. Small Rum. Res. 135, sup. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015. 12.010

Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. 2018. InfoStat, versión 2018´,

Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina..

Gutman G, Iturregui ME, Filadoro A. 2004. Informe Cepal: Propuestas para la formulación de políticas para el

desarrollo de tramas productivas regionales: El caso de la lechería caprina en Argentina. Series de la CEPAL,

Estudios y perspectivas, mayo 2004, 94 pp.

Hempstead MN, Lindquist TM, Shearer JK, Shearer LC, Cave VM, Plummer PJ. 2021. Welfare Assessment of 30

Dairy Goat Farms in the Midwestern United States Front. Vet. Sci., Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare. Vol.

8. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.646715

Jackson KMA, Hackett D. 2007. A note: The effects of human handling on heart girth, behaviour and milk quality

in dairy goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 108: 332-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.011

Jørgensen GHM, Andersen IL, Bøe KE. 2007. Feed intake and social interactions in dairy goats– the effects of

feeding space and type of roughage. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107: 239–251.

Leite LO, Stamm FO, Souza RA, Camarinha Filho JA, Garcia RCM. 2020. On-farm welfare assessment in dairy

goats in the Brazilian Northeast. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 72,.6: 2308-2320. DOI: 10.1590/ 1678-4162-11691

Loretz C, Wechsler B, Hauser R, Reusch P. 2004. A comparison of space requirements of horned and hornless

goats at the feed barrier and in the lying area. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 87: 275-283. DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.005

Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. 1991. Determinación del tamaño de las muestras en estudios sanitarios: manual práctico. Ginebra; Organización Mundial de la salud. VIII, 80 pp.

Martínez GM, Suarez, VH. 2018. Lechería Caprina: producción, manejo, sanidad, calidad de leche y productos. 1ra

Ed. INTA Ediciones, Colección Investigación, desarrollo e innovación. 167 p. Archivo digital. ISBN Nº 978-987-

521-972-4. https://inta.gob.ar/documentos/lecheria-caprina-produccion-manejo-sanidad-calidad-de-leche

Mattiello S, Battini M, Andreoli E, Minero M, Barbieri S, Canali E. 2010. Technical note. Avoidance distance test

in goats: A comparison with its application in cows. Small Rumin. Res. 91: 215-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.03.002.

McDougall S, Pankey W, Delaney C, Barlow J, Murdough PA, Scruton D. 2002. Prevalence and incidence of subclinical mastitis in goats and dairy ewes in Vermont, USA. Small Rumin. Res. 46: 115-121. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-

4488(02)00191-8

McGregor BA, Butler KL. 2008. Relationship of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system to the mortality of Angora goats from hypothermia and their use in the assessment of welfare risks.

Aust. Vet. J. 86: 12-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00249.x

Muri K, Stubsjøen SM, Valle PS. 2013. Development and testing of an on-farm welfare assessment protocol for

dairy goats. Anim. Welf. 22: 385-400. DOI: 10.7120/09627286.22.3.385

Silanikove N. 2000. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Rum Res. 35:181-

193. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00096-6

12

Silva Salas MA, Mondragón-Ancelmo J, Jiménez Badillo MR, Rodríguez Licea G, Napolitano F. 2020. Assessing

dairy goat welfare in intensive or semi-intensive farming conditions in Mexico. J. Dairy Sci. 104: 6175-6184.

DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19557

Suarez VH, Fondraz M, Viñabal AE, Martínez GM, Salatin AO. 2013 Epidemiología de los nematodes gastrointestinales en caprinos lecheros en los valles templados del NOA, Argentina. RIA 2, 39: 191-197.

Suarez VH, Fondraz M, Viñabal AE, Salatin AO. 2014. Validación del método FAMACHA© para detectar anemia

en caprinos lecheros en los valles templados del Noroeste Argentino. Rev. Med. Vet. (Buenos Aires) 95: 4-11.

Suarez VH, Martínez GM. 2019. Infectious and Parasitic Disease Presence in Smallholder’s Dairy Goat Flocks from

the Arid Regions of Northwestern Argentina. Dairy Vet. Sci. J. 14: 555886. DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2019.14.555886

Suarez VH, Martínez Almudebar FC. 2020. Guía para el reconocimiento de las principales enfermedades de los

rumiantes detectadas en el departamento Guachipas, provincia de Salta. CFI, Gob. provincia de Salta, INTA,

SENASA. 91 pp.

Suarez VH, Martínez GM, Olmos LH. 2021. Epidemiology of Goat Nematode Infections in Different Ecological

Regions of Argentina´s Northwest. Asian J. Res. Biosci. 3: 29-37.

Suarez VH, Martínez GM. 2025. Diseño de un protocolo para la medición del bienestar animal en caprinos lecheros. Ciencia Veterinaria, E-ISSN 1853-8495. DOI: 10.19137/cienvet.v27.8962

Villaquiran M, Gipson T, Merkel R, Goetsch A, Sahlu T. 2007. Body Condition Scores in Goats. in Proc. 22nd Ann.

Goat Field Day, Langston University, Langston, OK. pp. 125-131.

Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. 2006. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101: 185-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001

Webster AJF. 2003 Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying

hens: consensus of expert Opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205-217. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600025641

Whay HR, Main DC, Green LE, Webster AJF. 2003. Animal Based measures for the assessment of the welfare state

of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205-217.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Validation of an animal welfare protocol on dairy goat farms. (2025). FAVE Sección Ciencias Veterinarias, 24(1), e0046. https://doi.org/10.14409/favet.2025.1.e0046

Most read articles by the same author(s)