Validation of an animal welfare protocol on dairy goat farms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/favet.2025.1.e0046Keywords:
dairy goats, animal welfare, assessment protocol, Argentina NorthwestAbstract
The purpose was to validate animal welfare indicators through an animal welfare assessment protocol in goat milk
farms under different production systems in the northwest (NOA) of Argentina. The study included 6 extensive farms and 5
semi-extensive farms with daytime grazing and nighttime confinement and 1 with total confinement, located in the regions of
arid canyon and valleys (n=7, QyVA) and temperate valleys and rain forest (n=5, VTyY). The protocol was divided into two parts,
one based on the observation of the environment conditions, nutritional, sanitary and milking management, animal behavior
and human-animal relationship. The second was based on the inspection of 20 ±5 goats in milking, recording the prevalence of
body condition, cleanliness degree,clinical signs and hoof trimming and dehorning. Each parameter received a partial score to
be summed to obtain the final total score, where those parameters observed directly by the evaluators were emphasized over those
recorded through the producer's report. The protocol was feasible since the implementation time was less than 2 hours and the
costs were low. The final average score of the farms was 64.4±17.4%, over the final optimum score, reaching the maximum in the
2
category of prevalence of individual clinical signs (87.2%) and the minimum in social interaction and contributions to wellbeing (28.1%). When analyzing by category of well-being, differences were only found between the extensive and semi-extensive
systems regarding environment conditions and comfort (X
2
4.3; p< 0.04) and environment and hygiene (X
2
7.0; p< 0.008),
where a greater number of semi-extensive systems exceeded the average score of the total farms compared to the extensive ones.
Regarding the prevalence of clinical signs, a trend was observed (X
2
3.08; p< 0.07) that a greater number of those flocks located
in the QyVA region exceeded the average score compared to those located in the VTyY, which presented a higher prevalence of
Famacha scores 4 and 5 and lameness. It is concluded that the selected set of management and animal-based measures was able
to discriminate the welfare of goats between farms in different regions and productive systems of the NOA
References
Anzuino K, Bell NJ, Bazeley KJ, Nicol CJ. 2010. Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms
based on direct observations. Vet. Rec. 167: 774-780. DOI: 10.1136/vr.c5892
AWIN. 2015. AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goats.DOI: 10 .13130/ AWIN goats 2015.
Barroso FG, Alados CL, Boza J. 2000. Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production.
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69 1: 35-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00113-1
Bartussek H, Leeb CH, Held S. 2000. Animal needs index for cattle. ANI 35 L/2000-cattle. Federal Research Institute for Agriculture. www.bal.bmlf.gv.at/index.php
Battini M, Stilwell G, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Canali E, Mattiello S. 2015. On-farm welfare assessment protocol for
adult dairy goats in intensive production systems. Animals (Basel) 5: 934-950. DOI: 10.3390/ani5040393
Battini M, Barbieri S, Vieira A, Stilwell G, Mattiello S. 2016. Results of testing the prototype of the AWIN welfare
assessment protocol for dairy goats in 30 intensive farms in Northern Italy, Italian Journal of Animal Science
15, 2: 283-293. DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1150795
Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. 2010. The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal wellbeing. Acta Agric. Scand. Anim. Sci., 60: 129-140. DOI:10.1080/09064702.2010.523480
11
Cabiddu A., Branca A, Decandia M, Pes A, Santucci PM, Masoero F, Calamari L. 1999. Relationship between body
con dition score, metabolic profile, milk yield and milk composition in goats browsing a Mediterranean
shrubland. Livestock Prod. Sci. 61: 267-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00076-7
Can E, Vieira A, Battini M, Mattiello S, Stilwell G. 2016. On-farm welfare assessment of dairy goat farms using
animal-based indicators: the example of 30 commercial farms in Portugal. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica
Section A - Animal Science. 66, 1: 43.55. DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2016.1208267
Can E, Vieira A, Battini M, Mattiello S, Stilwell G. 2017. Consistency over time of animal-based welfare indicators
as a further step for developing a welfare assessment monitoring scheme: The case of the Animal Welfare
Indicators protocol for dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 100: 9194-9204. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12825
Caroprese M, Napolitano F, Mattiello S, Fthenakis GC, Ribo O, Sevi A. 2015. On-farm welfare monitoring of small
ruminants. Small Rum. Res. 135, sup. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015. 12.010
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. 2018. InfoStat, versión 2018´,
Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina..
Gutman G, Iturregui ME, Filadoro A. 2004. Informe Cepal: Propuestas para la formulación de políticas para el
desarrollo de tramas productivas regionales: El caso de la lechería caprina en Argentina. Series de la CEPAL,
Estudios y perspectivas, mayo 2004, 94 pp.
Hempstead MN, Lindquist TM, Shearer JK, Shearer LC, Cave VM, Plummer PJ. 2021. Welfare Assessment of 30
Dairy Goat Farms in the Midwestern United States Front. Vet. Sci., Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare. Vol.
8. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.646715
Jackson KMA, Hackett D. 2007. A note: The effects of human handling on heart girth, behaviour and milk quality
in dairy goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 108: 332-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.011
Jørgensen GHM, Andersen IL, Bøe KE. 2007. Feed intake and social interactions in dairy goats– the effects of
feeding space and type of roughage. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107: 239–251.
Leite LO, Stamm FO, Souza RA, Camarinha Filho JA, Garcia RCM. 2020. On-farm welfare assessment in dairy
goats in the Brazilian Northeast. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 72,.6: 2308-2320. DOI: 10.1590/ 1678-4162-11691
Loretz C, Wechsler B, Hauser R, Reusch P. 2004. A comparison of space requirements of horned and hornless
goats at the feed barrier and in the lying area. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 87: 275-283. DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.005
Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. 1991. Determinación del tamaño de las muestras en estudios sanitarios: manual práctico. Ginebra; Organización Mundial de la salud. VIII, 80 pp.
Martínez GM, Suarez, VH. 2018. Lechería Caprina: producción, manejo, sanidad, calidad de leche y productos. 1ra
Ed. INTA Ediciones, Colección Investigación, desarrollo e innovación. 167 p. Archivo digital. ISBN Nº 978-987-
521-972-4. https://inta.gob.ar/documentos/lecheria-caprina-produccion-manejo-sanidad-calidad-de-leche
Mattiello S, Battini M, Andreoli E, Minero M, Barbieri S, Canali E. 2010. Technical note. Avoidance distance test
in goats: A comparison with its application in cows. Small Rumin. Res. 91: 215-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.03.002.
McDougall S, Pankey W, Delaney C, Barlow J, Murdough PA, Scruton D. 2002. Prevalence and incidence of subclinical mastitis in goats and dairy ewes in Vermont, USA. Small Rumin. Res. 46: 115-121. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-
4488(02)00191-8
McGregor BA, Butler KL. 2008. Relationship of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system to the mortality of Angora goats from hypothermia and their use in the assessment of welfare risks.
Aust. Vet. J. 86: 12-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00249.x
Muri K, Stubsjøen SM, Valle PS. 2013. Development and testing of an on-farm welfare assessment protocol for
dairy goats. Anim. Welf. 22: 385-400. DOI: 10.7120/09627286.22.3.385
Silanikove N. 2000. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Rum Res. 35:181-
193. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00096-6
12
Silva Salas MA, Mondragón-Ancelmo J, Jiménez Badillo MR, Rodríguez Licea G, Napolitano F. 2020. Assessing
dairy goat welfare in intensive or semi-intensive farming conditions in Mexico. J. Dairy Sci. 104: 6175-6184.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19557
Suarez VH, Fondraz M, Viñabal AE, Martínez GM, Salatin AO. 2013 Epidemiología de los nematodes gastrointestinales en caprinos lecheros en los valles templados del NOA, Argentina. RIA 2, 39: 191-197.
Suarez VH, Fondraz M, Viñabal AE, Salatin AO. 2014. Validación del método FAMACHA© para detectar anemia
en caprinos lecheros en los valles templados del Noroeste Argentino. Rev. Med. Vet. (Buenos Aires) 95: 4-11.
Suarez VH, Martínez GM. 2019. Infectious and Parasitic Disease Presence in Smallholder’s Dairy Goat Flocks from
the Arid Regions of Northwestern Argentina. Dairy Vet. Sci. J. 14: 555886. DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2019.14.555886
Suarez VH, Martínez Almudebar FC. 2020. Guía para el reconocimiento de las principales enfermedades de los
rumiantes detectadas en el departamento Guachipas, provincia de Salta. CFI, Gob. provincia de Salta, INTA,
SENASA. 91 pp.
Suarez VH, Martínez GM, Olmos LH. 2021. Epidemiology of Goat Nematode Infections in Different Ecological
Regions of Argentina´s Northwest. Asian J. Res. Biosci. 3: 29-37.
Suarez VH, Martínez GM. 2025. Diseño de un protocolo para la medición del bienestar animal en caprinos lecheros. Ciencia Veterinaria, E-ISSN 1853-8495. DOI: 10.19137/cienvet.v27.8962
Villaquiran M, Gipson T, Merkel R, Goetsch A, Sahlu T. 2007. Body Condition Scores in Goats. in Proc. 22nd Ann.
Goat Field Day, Langston University, Langston, OK. pp. 125-131.
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. 2006. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101: 185-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
Webster AJF. 2003 Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying
hens: consensus of expert Opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205-217. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600025641
Whay HR, Main DC, Green LE, Webster AJF. 2003. Animal Based measures for the assessment of the welfare state
of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205-217.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Victor Humberto Suarez, Gabriela Marcela Martinez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
FAVE Sección Ciencias Veterinarias ratifies the open access model, in which contents (in full) are available free to anyone in the internet. The costs of production and publication are not transfered to the authors. This policy intends to break social and economical barriers that generate inequities in the access to information, and for the publication of research results.
All articles can be accessed at http://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/FAVEveterinaria/issue/current/, under license Creative CommonsAtribución-NoComercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional.






