Prioritization of areas for anthrax control in the province of La Pampa based on ecological factors

Authors

  • Pablo Mauricio Vázquez National Agricultural Technology Institute image/svg+xml
  • María del Carmen Rojas National Agricultural Technology Institute image/svg+xml
  • Ezequiel Alejandro Fernández National Food Safety and Quality Service image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14409/favet.2025.1.e0053

Keywords:

Bacillus anthracis, spatial modeling, environmental risk, vaccination prioritization, semiarid region

Abstract

Anthrax, caused by Bacillus anthracis, is a highly lethal zoonosis with global distribution, sustained by the environmental persistence of bacterial spores. This study aims to identify environmental drivers of anthrax outbreaks reported between 2008 and 2025 in La Pampa Province, Argentina, to spatially prioritize zones for disease control interventions. Fifty-nine outbreak locations were georeferenced and analyzed using five risk-related variables: annual soil moisture, actual evapotranspiration, pre-outbreak drought index, surface runoff features, and grazing pressure. Proportion tests (Z-test) revealed that 81% of outbreaks occurred on watershed limits, in areas with annual soil moisture ≥ 2.8 kg/m² and evapotranspiration ≥ 600 mm/year. Most outbreaks coincided with wet or normal moisture periods and occurred under average or below-average livestock stocking rate. An ecological corridor of 7.9 million hectares was delineated as a high-risk zone, with 3.3 million hectares prioritized due to their positioning along watershed divides. Mandatory vaccination is recommended for farms with prior outbreaks and for those situated in hydrologically and climatically defined risk areas.

References

Brownlie T, Bishop T, Parry M, Salmon SE, Hunnam JC. 2020. Predicting the periodic risk of anthrax in livestock in Victoria, Australia, using meteorological data. Int. J. Biometeorol. 64: 601-610. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-019-01849-0

Carlson CJ, Getz WM, Kausrud KL, Cizauskas CA, Blackburn JK, Bustos Carrillo FA, Colwell R, Easterday WR, Ganz HH, Kamath PL, Økstad OA, Turner WC, Kolstø AB, Stenseth NC. 2018. Spores and soil from six sides: interdisciplinarity and the environmental biology of anthrax (Bacillus anthracis). Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 93: 1813-1831. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12420

Carlson CJ, Kracalik IT, Ross N, Alexander KA, Hugh-Jones ME, Fegan M, Elkin BT, Epp T, Shury TK, Zhang W, Bagirova M, Getz WM, Blackburn JK. 2019. The global distribution of Bacillus anthracis and associated anthrax risk to humans, livestock and wildlife. Nat. Microbiol. 4: 1337-1343. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0435-4

Carrazoni JA. 1993. Historia de Ganaderos y de Veterinarios. Ed. Altuna, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 224 pp.

Chen H, Verplaetse E, Jauslin T, Cosson P, Slamti L, Lereclus D. 2022. The fate of bacteria of the Bacillus cereus group in the amoeba environment. Microb. Ecol. 83: 1088-1104. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01828-2

Cocimano M, Lange A, Menvielle E. 1977. Equivalencias ganaderas para vacunos de carne y ovinos: escalas simplificadas. AACREA. 22 pp.

Deka MA, Vieira AR, Bower WA. 2022. Modelling the ecological niche of naturally occurring anthrax at global and circumpolar extents using an ensemble modelling framework. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 69: e2563-e2577. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14602

Dey R, Hoffman PS, Glomski IJ. 2012. Germination and amplification of anthrax spores by soil-dwelling amoebas. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 8075-8081. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02034-12

Dragon DC, Rennie RP. 1995. The ecology of anthrax spores: tough but not invincible. Can. Vet. J. 36: 295-301.

Fasanella A, Galante D, Garofolo G, Jones MH. 2010. Anthrax undervalued zoonosis. Vet. Microbiol. 140: 318-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.016

Feddema JJ. 2005. A Revised Thornthwaite-Type Global Climate Classification. Phy. Geogr. 26: 442-466. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3646.26.6.442

Fort M, Rojas MC, Bedotti DO, Pérez L, Esaín FY. 2004. Carbunclo bacteridiano en bovinos en la provincia de La Pampa durante el periodo enero 2000 - junio 2004. Publicación Técnica Nº 58. INTA, EEA Anguil: 5-8.

Hugh-Jones M, de Vos V. 2002. Anthrax and wildlife. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 21: 359-383. DOI: 10.20506/rst.21.2.1336

Hugh-Jones M, Blackburn J. 2009. The ecology of Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Aspects. Med. 30: 356-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.08.003

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, provincia de La Pampa y Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. 2004. Inventario Integrado de los recursos naturales de la provincia de La Pampa. Segunda edición. INTA, Buenos Aires. 471 pp.

Lee K, Costerton JW, Ravel J, Auerbach RK, Wagner DM, Keim P, Leid JG. 2007. Phenotypic and functional characterization of Bacillus anthracis biofilms. Microbiology 153: 1693-1701. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003376-0

Lewerin SS, Elvander M, Westermark T, Hartzell LN, Norström AK, Ehrs S, Knutsson R, Englund S, Andersson AC, Granberg M, Bäckman S, Wikström P, Sandstedt K. 2010. Anthrax outbreak in a Swedish beef cattle herd - 1st case in 27 years: case report. Acta Vet. Scand. 52: 7. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-7

Maksimovic Z, Cornwell MS, Semren O, Rifatbegovic M. 2017. The apparent role of climate change in a recent anthrax outbreak in cattle. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 36: 959-963. DOI: 10.20506/rst.36.3.2727

Noseda RP. 2023. Situación del carbunclo rural en la Argentina. 2023. https://anav.org.ar/producion-cientifica/temas-de-actualidad/#:~:text=No%20se%20produjeron%20brotes%20de,22%20partidos%2C%20resultando%20todas%20negativas

Organización Mundial de la Salud, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal. 2008. Ántrax en humanos y animales. Cuarta edición. Ginebra (Suiza): Organización Mundial de la Salud. 208 pp.

Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OMSA) 2023. Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres. https://www.woah.org/es/que-hacemos/normas/codigos-y-manuales/

Rojas MC, Vázquez PM, Verdier M, Noseda R. 2011. Componentes del paisaje que favorecen la aparición de carbunco en la Pampa Deprimida (provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina). Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 30: 897-909.

Rui H, Beaudoing H. 2022. README Document for NASA GLDAS version 2 Data Products. Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC). http://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/

Schuch R, Fischetti VA. 2009. The secret life of the anthrax agent Bacillus anthracis: bacteriophage-mediated ecological adaptations. PLoS ONE 4: e6532. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006532

Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA). 2024. Cuarto informe de notificaciones de enfermedades denunciables - Carbunclo bacteridiano. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2018/08/informe_carbunclo_2013-2022.pdf

Shadomy S, El Idrissi A, Raizman E, Bruni M, Palamara E, Pittiglio C, Lubroth J. 2016. Anthrax outbreaks: a warning for improved prevention. Control and heightened awareness EMPRES Watch, FAO, Rome. Vol. 37: 8 pp. http://www.fao.org/ag/empres.html

Sushma B, Shedole S, Suresh KP, Leena G, Patil SS, Srikantha G. 2021. An estimate of global anthrax prevalence in livestock. A meta-analysis. Vet. World 14: 1263-1271. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1263-1271

Vázquez P, Rojas M, Fernandez E, Gonzalez A. 2023. Factores limitantes de la tasa de destete en sistemas de producción de carne bovina en la región criadora de la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecuaria 24: 1-18. DOI: 10.21930/rcta.vol24_num2_art:2712

Ziese M, Schneider U, Meyer-Christoffer A, Schamm K, Vido J, Finger P, Bissolli P, Pietzsch S, Becker A. 2014. The GPCC Drought Index – a new, combined and gridded global drought index. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 6: 285-295. DOI: 10.5194/essd‐6‐285‐2014

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Prioritization of areas for anthrax control in the province of La Pampa based on ecological factors. (2025). FAVE Sección Ciencias Veterinarias, 24(1), e0053. https://doi.org/10.14409/favet.2025.1.e0053