La lógica como una ciencia normativa: las razones de Peirce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/topicos.2025.47.e0127Palavras-chave:
Ética, Estética, Teoría lógica, Razonamiento, NormatividadResumo
En este artículo expondré las principales razones que tuvo Charles Sanders Peirce para considerar a la lógica como una ciencia normativa. He dividido este trabajo en dos apartados. El primero está dedicado a mostrar el lugar que, según Peirce, ocupa la lógica en el “mapa de las ciencias”, y en él expongo las razones del anti-excepcionalismo (lógico) de Peirce y de la pertinencia de una clasificación de las ciencias. El segundo apartado está dedicado a describir las principales razones del filósofo estadounidense para considerar a la lógica como una ciencia normativa, poniendo particular atención en el que, de acuerdo con Peirce, es el problema central de la lógica y en sus razones por las que el razonamiento es deliberativo.
Downloads
Referências
Allwein, Gerard y Barwise, Jon. (1996). Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford University Press.
Arana, Andrew y Mancosu, Paolo (2020). Sobre la relación entre la geometría plana y la geometría sólida. En Infinito, lógica, geometría (pp. 321-408). College Publications.
Bechtel, William (2015). cognitive science. Recent developments [entrada]. En The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3rd Edition) (pp. 169-173). Cambridge University Press.
Bellucci, Franceso y Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2015). Charles Sanders Peirce: Logic. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/peir-log/
Birkhoff, Garrett. (1940). Lattice Theory. American Mathematical Society.
Boghossian, Paul y Wright, Crispin (2024). Kripke, Quine, the ‘Adoption Problem’ and the Empirical Conception of Logic. Mind, 133(529), 86-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzad011
Bolzano, Bernard (1999). Contributions to a better-grounded presentation of mathematics. En From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics (Volume I) (pp. 174-224). Oxford University Press.
Boolos, George (1998). 1879? En Logic, Logic, and Logic (pp. 237-254). Harvard University Press.
Burch, Robert (2024). Charles Sanders Peirce. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/peirce/
Cayley, Arthur (1999). Presidential Address to the British Association. En From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics (pp. 542-573). Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Chung-Ying (1966). Peirce’s Probabilistic Theory of Inductive Validity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 2(2), 86-112.
Corcoran, John (2015). ancestral (of a given relation R) [entrada]. En The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3rd Edition) (p. 36). Cambridge University Press.
De Waal, Cornelis y Skowronski, Krysztof (eds.) (2012). The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Fordham University Press.
Dedekind, Richard (1963). The Nature and Meaning of Numbers. En Essays on the Theory of Numbers (pp. 29-115). Dover.
Delaney, Cornelius (2015). Dewey, John [entrada]. En The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3rd Edition) (pp. 265-268). Cambridge University Press.
Ewald, William (1999). Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914). En From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics (Volume I) (pp. 574-584). Oxford University Press.
Fisch, Max (et al.). (1982). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Indiana University Press.
Haack, Susan (1979). Fallibilism and Necessity. Synthese, 41(1), 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869649
Harman, Gilbert (1984). Logic and Reasoning. Synthese, 60(1), 107-127. doi:10.1007/BF00485621
Harman, Gilbert (2002). Internal Critique: a Logic is Not a Theory of Reasoning and Theory of Reasoning is Not a Logic. En Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: the Turn Towards the Practical (vol. 1) (pp. 171-186). Elsevier.
Harman, Gilbert (2009). Field on the Normative Role of Logic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 109, 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2009.00271.x
Hartshorne, Charles y Weiss, Paul (eds.) (1960). Introduction. En Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume II: Elements of Logic (pp. iii-v). Harvard University Press.
Hilpinen, Risto (1982). On C. S. Peirce’s Theory of the Proposition: Peirce as a Precursor of Game-Theoretical Semantics. The Monist, 65(2), 182-188. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198265213
Hintikka, Jaakko (1998). El lugar de C. S. Peirce en la historia de la lógica. En El viaje filosófico más largo: De Aristóteles a Virginia Woolf (pp. 215-243). Gedisa.
Hjortland, Ole (2017). Anti-exceptionalism about logic. Philosophical Studies, 174(3), 631-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0701-8
Johnson-Laird, Philip. (2008). How We Reason. Oxford University Press.
Kripke, Saul (2024). The Question of Logic. Mind, 133(529), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzad008
Laplace, Pierre-Simon (2009). Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités. Cambridge University Press.
Legendre, Adrien-Marie. (1834). Elements of geometry and trigonometry. Harper and Brothers.
Legg, Catherine y Misak, Cheryl (2016). Charles Sanders Peirce on Necessity. En Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity (pp. 256-278). Cambridge University Press.
MacFarlane, John (2004, abril). In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought?. Artículo presentado en el simposio sobre la normatividad de la lógica de la Central Division APA 2004. Organizado por la American Philosophical Association, Chicago.
Mancosu, Paolo (2020). Midiendo el tamaño de colecciones infinitas de números naturales: ¿era inevitable la teoría de Cantor de número infinito?. En Infinito, lógica, geometría (pp. 19-66). College Publications.
McNabb, Darin. (2018). Hombre, signo y cosmos: La filosofía de Charles S. Peirce. FCE.
Nidditch, Peter. (1995). El desarrollo de la Lógica matemática. Cátedra.
Peano, Giuseppe (1977). The principles of arithmetic, presented by a new method. En From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931 (pp. 85-97). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, Charles (1867). On a new list of categories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 7, 287-298.
Peirce, Charles (1870). Description of a notation for the logic of relatives, resulting from an amplification of the conceptions of Boole’s calculus of logic. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 9, 317-378.
Peirce, Charles (1880). On the Algebra of Logic. American Journal of Mathematics, 3, 104-157.
Peirce, Charles (1881). On the Logic of Number. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2369151
Peirce, Charles (1883). A theory of probable inference (with two notes). En Studies in Logic by members of the Johns Hopkins University. Little, Brown.
Peirce, Charles (1885). On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation. American Journal of Mathematics, 7(2-3), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2369451
Peirce, Charles (1897). The Logic of Relatives. The Monist, 7(2), 161-217. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18977231
Peirce, Charles (1960). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volumes I and II. Harvard University Press.
Peirce, Charles (1993). Letter, Peirce to A. Marquand. En Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce (vol. 5) (pp. 421-423). Indiana University Press.
Peirce, Charles. (2012). Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo I (1867-1893). FCE.
Peirce, Charles. (2012). Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo II (1893-1913). FCE.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2005), Cultivating Habits of Reason: Peirce and the Logica Utens versus Logica Docens Distinction. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 22(4), 357-372.
Putnam, Hilary (1982). Peirce the logician. Historia Mathematica, 9, 290-301. DOI: 10.1016/0315-0860(82)90123-9
Ransdell, Joseph (1977). Some Leading Ideas of Peirce’s Semiotic. Semiotica, 19(3-4), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1977.19.3-4.157
Riemann, Bernhard (2007). On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry. En God Created The Integers (pp. 1031-1042). Running Press.
Russell, Bertrand. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, Gillian (2017). Logic isn’t normative. Inquiry, 63(3-4), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1372305
Sheffer, Henry (1913). A Set of Five Independent Postulates for Boolean Algebras, with Application to Logical Constants. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 14(4), 481-488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1988701
Shin, Sun-Joo (2024). Peirce’s Deductive Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/peirce-logic/
Schröder, Ernst. (1890). Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik. Teubner.
Sevilla, Martín. (1991). Antología de los primeros estoicos griegos. Akal.
Steinberger, Florian (2022). The Normative Status of Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/logic-normative/
Sylvan, Kurt (2024). The Possibility of Internalist Epistemology. En Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) (pp. 36-53). Wiley-Blackwell.
Tarski, Alfred (1941). On the Calculus of Relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6(3), 73-89. doi:10.2307/2268577
Van Heijenoort, Jean. (1977). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. Harvard University Press.
Wagner, Steven (2015). relation [entrada]. En The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3rd Edition) (pp. 920-921). Cambridge University Press.
Webb, Judson (2006). Hintikka on Aristotelian constructions, Kantian intuitions, and Peircian theorems. En The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (pp. 195-302). Open Court.
Whitehead, Alfred N. (1898). A treatise on universal algebra, with applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (2003). Investigaciones filosóficas. UNAM.
Woods, John (et al). (2002). Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: the Turn Towards the Practical (vol. 1). Elsevier.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 1969 Emilio Méndez Pinto
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
