Especificación de un modelo para el estudio de la elección reproductiva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/fabicib.v26i2.12258Palabras clave:
salud sexual, salud reproductiva, elección racional, interrupción del embarazoResumen
Objetive: The discussion and specification of a model for the study of freedom of choice with respect to the termination of pregnancy was the objective of this document. Materials and Method: A documentary study was carried out with an intentional selection of sources indexed to Dialnet, Latindex, Publindex, Redalyc and Scielo from 1961 to 2019. Results: The research design limited the results to the literature consulted, suggesting the extension of the work based on the information published in Copernicus, Ebsco, Scopus and WoS. Conclusions: The research design limited the findings to the research scenario, suggesting the inclusion of the State as a funding and facilitator of safe abortion.
Citas
National Population Council Gender and abortion statistics. Mexico: Conapo. 2014
National Institute of Women Statistics of the decriminalization of abortion. Mexico: Inmujeres. 2010
Amuchastegui A, Flores E, Aldaz E. Subjective dispute and social dispute. Religion, gender and social discourses in the legislation of abortion in Mexico. Journal of Gender Studies, 2015; 5 (41), 153-195
Hevla A, Villar M, Martínez F. A critical review of the debate on human needs from the focus on the person. Polis, 2006; 5 (15), 1-18
Quintero M, Valdés O, Delgado M, Garcia C. Evaluation of a model of the institutional self-care strategies. Condom use and prevention in university students. Health Problem, 2018; 12 (23). 56-68
Romero R. Theory of freedom of choice: Application in ethical praxis. Quipukamayoc, 2014; 22 (42), 149-167
Sandoval F, Garcia C, Bustos J. Exploratory factor structure of planned abortion in students of Xochimilco, Mexico City. Perspectives, 2016; 2 (2), 4050
Velez S, Rosas F, Garcia C. Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures perceptions of couple relationships. Eureka, 2018; 15 (2), 269-282
Zaratiegui J. John Stuart Mill: an economist who loves freedom. Cuadernos de Administración, 2001; 14 (23), 131-149
Boonstra H. Abortion in the lives of woman struggling financially: Why insurance coverage matters. Guttmacher Policy Review, 2016; 19, 46-52 https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gpr1904616_0.pdf
Fatemeh G, Marzieh A. The rights of the fetus: ensoulment as the cut-off point legislation on abortion. Health Science Journal, 2015; 10, 1-5 http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/the-rights-of-the-fetus-ensoulment-as-the-cutoff-point-legislation-on-abortion.pdf
McDonagh E. Adding consent to choice in the abortion debate. Society, 2005; 1, 18-26 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a1f/2409cd7ff797c1471d750987eb99efd16aae.pdf
Mahierhofer W. Abortion democracy: sarahh Dielhl’s advocacy documentary film for women rights in Poland and South Africa. Sexual health Issues, 2017; 1 81), 1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.15761/SHI.1000106
Carreon J, Hernandez J, Morales M, Garcia C. Intentions of consensual sex and induced abortion in students of a public university in Mexico. Psychology, 2013; 13 (2), 24-38
Garcia C. Study of attitudes toward abortion in university students in Morelos, Mexico. Xhimai, 2011; 7 (13), 61-82
Garcia C. Attitudes towards assisted legal abortion. Social Work, 2012; 50, 269-279
Garcia C. Beliefs about induced abortion in a public hospital. Public Health, 2013; 22, 13-19
Garcia C, Carreon J, Aguilar J, Rosas F, Garcia E. Contrast of a model of reproductive sexuality. Psychology, 2014; 5 (1), 45-64
Garcia C, Carreon J, Hernández J, Bautista M, Méndez A. Socioeconomic and demographic determinants of attitudes towards abortion. Psychology, 2012; 15 (28), 262-270
Garcia C, Morales M, Méndez A, Delgado M, Vilchis F, López S, García C. Exploratory factorial structure around variables related to the interruption of pregnancy in students. Public Health, 2016; 12 (23), 1 5-28
Garcia C, Morales M, Mendez A, Delgado M, Vilchis F, López S. Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures perceptions of sexuality Rumbos, 2015; 10 (12), 87-93.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 FABICIB
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
