Ne bis in idem versus independence between instances: real or putative conflict?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v8i2.10670Keywords:
public law, power, control, independence of instances, ne bis in idemAbstract
At the center of the discussion about the viability – or not – of the accumulation of punishments and sanctions by the same facts is found the called principle of independence between the instances. One analyses some of the events that are related to the consecration of such principle; and, because of the content and of the implications of what has been agreed to be called ne bis in idem, it is verified that there is an incompatibility between these two institutes so, therefore, it is proposed that there should be a possible interpretation beginning from the collision law proposed by Robert Alexy.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).


















.png)

