El anhelo del todo: modelos de monarquía universal helenística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/argos.2022.47.e0040Palavras-chave:
Universalismo, Monarquía, HelenismoResumo
Las pretensiones de dominio universal manifestadas por los monarcas helenísticos han sido revaluadas en los últimos años y, lejos de ser simples enunciados propagandísticos, se presentan como una característica fundamental y necesaria de la realeza helenística. Se exploran aquí algunos de los paradigmas de monarquía que contribuyeron a la conformación de la idea del universalismo real, centrándonos, por un lado, en la influencia de los modelos proximorientales, y por el otro, en la recepción de la figura de Alejandro Magno. Se propone que es a partir de estos modelos que este “anhelo del todo” adquirió su contenido y su modulación.
Referências
Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2016). In the Garden of the Gods: Models of Kingship from the Sumerians to the Seleucids. Londres.
Austin, M. M. (1986). Hellenistic kings, war, and the economy. The Classical Quarterly, 36(2), 450-466.
Austin, M. M. (2006). The Hellenistic world from Alexander to the Roman conquest: A selection of ancient sources in translation. Cambridge.
Bang, P. F. (2012). Between Aśoka and Antiochos: an essay in world history on universal kingship and cosmopolitan culture in the Hellenistic ecumene. En P. F. Bang & D. Kolodziejczyk (eds.), Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History (pp. 60-75). Cambridge.
Briant, P. (2002). From Cyrus to Alexander: A history of the Persian Empire. Winona Lake.
Brosius, M. (2003). Chapter Seven: Alexander and the Persians. En J. Roisman (ed.), Brill's Companion to Alexander the Great (pp. 169-193). Leiden-Boston.
Canepa, M. (2017). Rival images of Iranian kingship and Persian identity in post-Achaemenid Western Asia. En R. Strootman & M. J. Versluys (eds.), Persianism in antiquity (pp. 201-222). Stuttgart.
Collins, A. W. (2008). The transformation of Alexander's court: the kingship, royal insignia and eastern court personnel of Alexander the Great. Dunedin.
D’Agostini, M. (2019). The Rise of Philip V. Kingship and Rule in the Hellenistic World. Alessandria
Erickson, K. (2011). Apollo-Nabû: the Babylonian Policy of Antiochus I. En K. Erickson & G. Ramsey (eds.), Seleucid Dissolution: The Sinking of the Anchor (pp. 51-66). Wiesbaden.
Fredriksmeyer, E. (1999). Alexander and the kingdom of Asia. En A. B. Bosworth & E. J. Baynham (eds.), Alexander the Great in fact and fiction (pp. 136-166). Oxford-Nueva York.
Galter, H. (2014). Sargon II. und die Eroberung der Welt. En H. Neumann, R. Dittmann, S. Paulus, G. Neumann & A. Schuster-Brandis (eds.), Krieg und Frieden im Alten Vorderasien (pp.329-343). Münster.
Gehrke, H. J. (2013). The Victorious King: Reflections on the Hellenistic Monarchy. En N. Luraghi (ed.), The Splendors and Miseries of Ruling Alone. Encounters with Monarchy from Archaic Greece to the Hellenistic Mediterranean (pp. 73-98). Stuttgart.
Gruen, E. S. (2018). The Coronation of the Diadochi. Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies, 1, 109-119.
Hammond, N. G. L. (1993). The Macedonian imprint on the Hellenistic world. En P. Green (ed.), Hellenistic History and Culture (pp. 12-37). Los Ángeles-Londres.
Herz, P. (1996). Hellenistische Könige. Zwischen griechischen Vorstellungen vom Königtum und Vorstellungen ihrer einheimischen Untertanen. En Small, A. (ed.), Subject and ruler: the cult of the ruling power in Classical Antiquity (pp. 27-40), Michigan.
Holton, J. (2018). The Reception of Alexander in the Ptolemaic Dynasty. En K. R. Moore (ed.), Brill's Companion to the Reception of Alexander the Great (pp. 96-118). Leiden-Boston.
Jones, P. (2005). Divine and non-divine kingship. En D. C. Snell (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Near East (pp. 330-342). Oxford.
King, C. J. (2010). Macedonian kingship and other political institutions. En J. Roisman & I. Worthington (eds.), A companion to ancient Macedonia (pp. 371-391). Oxford.
Kosmin, P. (2014a). Seeing Double in Seleucid Babylonia: Rereading the Borsippa Cylinder of Antiochus I. En A. Moreno & R. Thomas (eds.), Patterns of the Past: Epitēdeumata in the Greek Tradition (pp. 173-98). Oxford.
Kosmin, P. (2014b). The land of the elephant kings: space, territory, and ideology in the Seleucid Empire. Cambridge.
Liverani, M. (2017). Assiria. La preistoria dell’imperialismo. Roma.
Ma, J. T. C. (1999). Antiochos III and the cities of Western Asia Minor. Oxford-Nueva York.
Meeus, A. (2009). Alexander’s Image in the Age of the Successors. En W. Heckel & L. A. Tritle, (eds.), Alexander the Great: A New History (pp. 235-250). Oxford.
Meeus, A. (2013). Confusing aim and result? Hindsight and the disintegration of Alexander the Great’s empire. En A. Powell (ed.), Hindsight in Greek and Roman History (pp. 113-47). Llandysul.
Meeus, A. (2014). The territorial ambitions of Ptolemy I. Studia Hellenistica, 53, 263-306.
McGing, B. (2013). Youthfulness in Polybius: The Case of Philip V of Macedon. En B. Gibson & T. Harrison (eds.), Polybius and his world: Essays in memory of F. W. Walbank (pp. 181-200). Oxford.
Michalowski, P. (2010). Masters of the Four Corners of the Heavens: Views of the Universe in Early Mesopotamian Writings. En K. A. Raaflaub & R. J. A. Talbert (eds.), Geography and Ethnography: Perceptions of the World in Pre-Modern Societies (pp. 147-168). Oxford.
Moreno Leoni, Á. (2017) Entre Roma y el Mundo Griego. Memoria, autorrepresentación y didáctica del poder en las Historias de Polibio, Córdoba.
Rice, E. E. (1983). The Grand Procession of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Nueva York.
Sherwin-White, S. M. & Kuhrt, A. (1993). From Samarkhand to Sardis: A new approach to the Seleucid empire. Los Angeles.
Stewart, A. (1993). Faces of power: Alexander's image and Hellenistic politics. Los Ángeles.
Stoneman, R. (2019). The Greek Experience of India. Princeton.
Strootman, R. (2013). .The Seleukid Empire between Orientalism and Hellenocentrism: Writing the History of Iran in the Third and Second Centuries BCE. Iranian Studies, 11 (1-2), 17-35.
Strootman, R. (2014a). Hellenistic imperialism and the idea of world unity. En C. Rapp & H. A. Drake (eds.), The city in the classical and post-classical world: changing contexts of power and identity (pp. 38-61). Cambridge.
Strootman, R. (2014b). ‘Men to whose rapacity neither sea nor mountain sets a limit:’ The aims of the Diadochs. Studia Hellenistica, 53, 307–322.
Strootman, R. (2020a). Hellenism and Persianism in Iran: Culture and Empire after Alexander the Great. Dabir, 7, 201-227.
Strootman, R. (2020b). The Great Kings of Asia: Imperial titulature in the Seleukid and post-Seleukid Middle East. En R. Oetjen (ed.), New Perspectives in Seleucid history, archaeology and numismatics (pp, 123-157). Berlin-Boston.
Tuplin, C. (2008), The Seleucids and their Achaemenid predecessors: a Persian inheritance? En S. M. R. Darbandi, & A. Zournatzi (eds.), Ancient Greece and Ancient Iran: Cross-Cultural Encounters (pp. 109-136).
Visscher, M. S. (2020). Beyond Alexandria: Literature and Empire in the Seleucid World. Nueva York.
Walbank, F. W. (2002). Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic world: essays and reflections. Cambridge.
Wiesehöfer, J. (2001). Ancient Persia from 550 BC to 650 AD. Londres-Nueva York.
Will, E. (1979). Histoire politique du monde hellénistique (323-30 av. J.-C.). Nancy.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Argos
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
