Athetized Helen and Aphrodite: Aristarchus’ comments on Iliad III, 395-418
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/argos.2022.47.e0036Keywords:
Aristarchus, Helen, Athetesis, Homer, Archaic worldviewAbstract
Aristarchus of Samothrace, now considered the founder of modern philology, questioned the authenticity of the dialogue between Helen and Aphrodite in the third book of the Iliad. The grammarian athetized lines 396-418 on four grounds. Our main hypothesis is that his arguments, which we intend to carefully analyze here, are headed in the right direction, as they focus on elements that have neither precedent nor equal within the Homeric world. Although Aristarchus could not express it in these terms, the passage is indeed peculiar because it deviates from the expectations of the archaic Greek cultural code.
Downloads
References
Blondell, R. (2010). «Bitch that I Am»: Self-Blame and Self-Assertion in the Iliad. TAPhA, 140(1), pp. 1-32.
Blondell, R. (2013). Helen of Troy: Beauty, myth, devastation. Oxford-New York.
Crespo, M. I. (2017). El hombre y el dios. Heráclito, Apolo y el conocimiento de sí. En S. Magnavacca, M. I. Santa Cruz & L. Soares (eds.), Conocerse, cuidar de sí, cuidar de otro: Reflexiones antiguas y medievales (pp. 23-50). Buenos Aires.
Cunliffe, R. (1963). A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect. Norman.
de Jong, I. J. F. (2014). Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford.
Erbse, H. (ed.) (1969). Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia vetera)/Praefationem et scholia ad libros A - D continens. Berlin.
Fränkel, H. (1975). Early Greek poetry and philosophy: A history of Greek epic, lyric, and prose to the middle of the fifth century. Oxford.
Genette, G. (1989). Figuras III. Barcelona.
Kirk, G. S. (1985). The Iliad: A commentary. Cambridge-New York.
Krieter-Spiro, M. (2015). Homer’s Iliad: The Basel Commentary. Book III. Boston-Berlin.
Leaf, W. (ed.) (1900). The Iliad. Edited, with Apparatus Criticus, Prolegomena, Notes, and Appendices. London.
Reckford, K. J. (1964). Helen in the Iliad. GRBS, 5(1), 5-20.
Redfield, J. (2012). La Ilíada, naturaleza y cultura. Madrid.
Roisman, H. M. (2006). Helen in the Iliad. «Causa Belli» and Victim of War: From Silent Weaver to Public Speaker. AJPh, 127(1), 1-36.
Schironi, F. (2018). The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad Ann Arbor.
----------- (2019). La recepción de Homero en Alejandría: la edición homérica de Aristarco. AFC, 32(2), 69-88
Suzuki, M. (1989). Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, difference, and the epic. Ithaca.
Tsagalis, C. (2004). Epic grief: Personal laments in Homer’s Iliad. Berlin.
Tsagalis, C. (2009). Naming Helen: Localization, Meter and Semantics of a Homeric Character. En E. Karamalengou & E. Makrygianni (eds.), Ἀντιφίλησις. Studies in Honor of Professor I.-Th. Papademetriou (pp. 34-47). Stuttgart.
Vernant, J. P. (1990). Myth and society in ancient Greece. New York-Cambridge.
West, M. L. (ed.) (1998). Homerus Ilias. Volumen prius. Rhapsodias I-XII continens. Monachii et Lipsiae.
West, M. L. (2001). Studies in the text and transmission of the Iliad. München.
West, M. L. (ed.) (2000). Homeri Ilias. Volumen alterum. Rhapsodias XIII-XXI continens. Monachii et Lipsiae.
Worman, N. (2007). This Voice Which Is Not One: Helen’s Verbal Guises in Homeric Epic. En H. Bloom (ed.), Homer (pp.149-167). New York.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Argos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
