Dafnis y Cloe: rusticitas versus urbanitas

Authors

  • Francesca Mestre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14409/op.2023.1.e0004

Keywords:

Longus, Daphnis and Chloe, progymnasmata, synkrisis

Abstract

 

Longus wrote his novel, Daphnis and Chloe, with an obvious intention of being part of the genre, of which we retain other examples. Despite this, it is necessary to note the singularities that his novel has in comparison with the other examples. The aim of this paper is to highlight these singularities and try to justify them, always following, hypothetically, which is the purpose of the author. From the point of view of the narratology, he is aware, as is usual in the genre, of the training in the προγυμνάσματα received by the πεπαιδευμένοι in the schools of rhetors and sophists: narration, description, ethopeia, etc. However, Longus conspicuously uses another less common exercise, σύγκρισις, so his entire story revolves around parallels or comparisons, both when explaining the birth and the essence of the reciprocal loving feeling between the couple of the main characters, and when he defends, on the one hand, the most natural aspect of that feeling, i.e. love in rural environments and, on the other, when he compares to it the demands that urban conventions have established to legitimize the union of a heterosexual couple and, consequently, the setting–upof a new family. Longus’ σύγκρισις ἀγροῦ καὶ πόλεως focus on love, and surely gives him the opportunity to go beyond the simple presentation of a love story, seasoned with adventures until its consummation.

References

Alvares, Jean (2014). Daphnis and Chloe. Innocence and Experience, Archetypes and Art. En Cueva, Edmund and Byrne, Shannon (Eds.). A Companion to the Ancient Novel (pp. 26–42). Wiley Blackwell.

Bierl, Anton (2014). Love, Myth and Ritual. The Mythic Dimension and Adolescence in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe. En Cueva, Edmund and Byrne, Shannon (Eds.). A Companion to the Ancient Novel (pp. 441–455). Wiley Blackwell.

Bowie, Ewen (2019). Longus: Daphnis and Chloe. Cambridge University Press.

Cueva, Edmund and Byrne, Shannon (Eds.) (2014). A Companion to the Ancient Novel. Wiley Blackwell.

Di Marco, Massimo (2006). The Pastoral Novel and the Bucolic Tradition. En Fantuzzi, Marco and Papanghelis, Theodore. Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Brill, 479–497.

Effe, Bernd (1999). Longus: Towards a History of Bucolic and its Function in the Roman Empire». En Swain, Simon (Ed.). Oxford Readings in the Greek Novel (pp. 189–209). Oxford University Press.

Fernández Garrido, Regla (2019). Relato (διήγημα) y écfrasis (ἔκφρασις) en la novela griega. Myrtia 34, 105–129.

Fusillo, Massimo (1989). Il romanzo greco. Polifonia ed eros. Marsilio.

Harrison, Stephen; Paschalis, Michael; Frangoulidis, Stavros (Eds.) (2005). Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. Barkhuis.

Holzmeister, Angela (2014). Ekphrasis in the Ancient Novel. En Cueva, Edmund and Byrne, Shannon (Eds.). A Companion to the Ancient Novel (pp. 411–23). Wiley Blackwell.

Hunter, Richard (1983). A Study of Daphnis & Chloe. Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, George (2003). Progymnasmata. Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. SBL.

Kim, Lawrence (2008). Time. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 145–161) Cambridge University Press.

Konstan, David. (1994). Sexual Symmetry. Love in the Ancient Novel and related Genres. Princeton University Press.

Laird, Andrew (2008). Approaching style and rhetoric. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 201–217). Cambridge University Press.

Laplace, Marcelle (2010). Les Pastorales de Longos (Daphnis et Chloé). Peter Lang.

Mestre, Francesca (2016). Exercices scolaires: un moyen de réfléchir sans émotion et sans danger. Rursus 9. http://rursus.revues.org/1200

——— (1997). Urbanidad y autosuficiencia: la moneda no es physis. En Actas del 13º Simposio Nacional de Estudios Clásicos (pp. 239–245). Editorial de la UNLP.

Miralles, Carles (1977). Eros as nosos in the Greek novel. En Reardon, Bryan (Ed.). Erotica Antiqua. Acta of the International Conference on the Ancient Novel (pp. 20–21). Bangor.

Miralles, Carles (1968). La novela en la antigüedad clásica. Labor.

Mittelstadt, Michael (1970). Bucolic–Lyric Motifs and Dramatic Narrative in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe. RhM 113, 211–227.

Pandiri, Thalia (1985). Daphnis and Chloe: the Art of Pastoral Play. Ramus 14,116–41.

Paschalis, Michael (2005). The Narrator as Hunter: Longus, Virgil and Theocritus. En Harrison, Stephen; Paschalis, Michael and Frangoulidis, Stavros (Eds.). Metaphor and the Ancient Novel (pp. 50–67). Barkhuis.

Patillon, Michael (1997). Aelius Théon. Progymnasmata. Les Belles Lettres.

Perry, Ben Edwin (1967). The Ancient Romances. A literary–historical account of their origins. University of California Press.

Reardon, Bryan (1991). The Form of Greek Romance. Princeton University Press.

Reche Martínez, María Dolores (1991). Teón, Hermógenes, Aftonio. Ejercicios de retórica. Gredos.

Rohde, Erwin (19143) [1876]. Der griechische Roman und seine Vorläufer. Breitkopf und Härtel (reed. Hildesheim, Olms, 1974).

Romm, James (2008). Travel. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 109–126). Cambridge University Press.

Ruiz Montero, Consuelo (2006). La novela griega. Síntesis.

——— (2021). El proemio de los Relatos pastoriles de Longo y sus modelos épicos. En Jufresa, Montserrat i Mestre, Francesca. Àpoina. Estudis de literatura grega dedicats a Carles Miralles (pp. 503–519). Publicacions de l’IEC.

Sissa, Giulia (2021). Rustic Skepticism and Slow Sensuality. Ovid’s Ars amatoria and Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe. En Jufresa, Montserrat i Mestre, Francesca. Àpoina. Estudis de literatura grega dedicats a Carles Miralles (pp. 469–501). Publicacions de l’IEC.

Swain, Simon (Ed.) (1999). Oxford Readings in the Greek Novel. Oxford University Press.

Webb, Ruth (2009). Ekphrasis, imagination and persuasion in ancient rhetorical theory and practice. Ashgate.

Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.) (2008). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel. Cambridge University Press.

Whitmarsh, Tim (2008). Introduction. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

Whitmarsh, Tim (2008). Class. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 72–87). Cambridge University Press.

Whitmarsh, Tim (2011). Narrative and Identity in Ancient Greek Novel. Cambridge University Press.

Zeitlin, Froma (1990). The Poetics of Eros: Nature, Art, and Imitation in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe». En Halperin, David, Winkler, John and Zeitlin, Froma (Eds.). Before sexuality. The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (pp. 417–64). Princeton University Press.

——— (2008). Religion. En Whitmarsh, Tim (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Novel (pp. 91–108). Cambridge University Press.

Published

2023-10-26

How to Cite

Mestre, F. (2023). Dafnis y Cloe: rusticitas versus urbanitas. Ordia Prima, (1), e0004. https://doi.org/10.14409/op.2023.1.e0004

Issue

Section

Dossier