Impediments to the execution of the imposing budget and the damage to the planning of the State’s activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v7i1.9300Keywords:
imposing budget, coalition presidentialism, patronage, planning, public policiesAbstract
Constitutional amendments no. 86, of March 17, 2015, n. 100, of June 26, 2019 and no. 105, of December 12, 2019, instituted and disciplined modalities and forms of execution of the so-called “mandatory budget”, characterized by the mandatory execution of budgetary programming from individual parliamentary amendments and from State or Federal District benches. It highlights the role that parliamentary amendments play for the governance of the country in the context of coalition presidentialism and that the creation of the imposing budget was not able to remove political patronage and still causes
an interference in the planning of the state's activity, especially with regard to the implementation of public policies.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).


















.png)

