An empiric approach to the annulment activity of the Public Administration in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v11i1.13048Keywords:
administrative act; annulment of administrative acts; power of annulment; revocation of administrative acts; legal empirical research.Abstract
The annulment power of the Public Administration is one of the topics that draws most attention in the Argentine administrative doctrine. However, this issue has been approached mainly from a legal-dogmatic point of view, without any empirical studies on the matter. This last type of approach, however, is of interest since it would make it possible to inquire, among other things, how often administrative acts are annulled, on what issues the annulled acts are mostly based, who are the most affected by the annulment and what procedures are applied in practice. In this paper, we made an empirical approach to the annulment activity, including in this examination the ex officio, the judicial actions for annulment and the annulments requested by administrative appeals. To this end, we present and analyze the results of 18 requests for access to public information formulated to the ministries of the National Public Administration existing at the end of the period 2022. The paper also distinguishes the annulments according to the subject they dealt with and reviews the procedure applied according to what was indicated in the administrative acts. Finally, we discuss the implications of the results.
References
COMADIRA, Fernando G. Dictamen PTN No 307:167. El retorno hacia una sana doctrina en materia de suspensión de oficio de actos administrativos irregulares estables y presupuestos de admisibilidad de la pretensión de lesividad. Revista Argentina del Régimen de la Administración Pública, Buenos Aires, n. 486, p. 19-42, 2019.
COMADIRA, Fernando G. La acción de lesividad. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Astrea, 2019.
COMADIRA, Julio P. El procedimiento de anulación de oficio del acto administrativo y del reglamento. En: Procedimiento administrativo. Jornadas Nacionales de Derecho Administrativo 21, 22 y 23 de mayo de 2014. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Astrea, 2015, p. 497–511.
COMADIRA, Julio R. El acto administrativo en la ley nacional de procedimientos administrativos. Buenos Aires: La Ley, 2011.
COMADIRA, Julio R. La anulación de oficio del acto administrativo: La denominada “cosa juzgada” administrativa. Buenos Aires: Astrea, 1981.
COMADIRA, Julio R.; ESCOLA, Héctor. Curso de Derecho Administrativo. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot, 2013.
COVIELLO, Pedro J.J. Una ponderable doctrina de la Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación sobre el ejercicio de la acción de lesividad. El Derecho -Revista de Derecho Administrativo, Buenos Aires, v. 2019, 2019.
EPSTEIN, Lee; MARTIN, Andrew D. An introduction to empirical legal research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GALANTER, Marc. Why the “Haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review, Cambridge, v. 9, n. 1, p. 95–160, 1974.
GORDILLO, Agustín A.1. Tratado de derecho administrativo y obras selectas. 11. ed. Buenos Aires: Fundación de Derecho Administrativo, 2016.
GUSMAN, Alfredo S. La estabilidad del acto administrativo a treinta años de la conformación del régimen legal. El Derecho - Revista de Derecho Administrativo, Buenos Aires, v. 2007, 2007.
MORENO, Orlando J. De la inutilidad del recurso jerárquico en la actualidad. En: ALONSO REGUEIRA, Enrique M. (Dir.). Estudios de Derecho Público. Buenos Aires: Asociación de Docentes Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales UBA, 2013, p. 699–702. Disponible en: <http://www.derecho.uba.ar/docentes/pdf/estudios-de-derecho/006-edp-3-moreno-r-jerarquico.pdf>.
MORENO, Orlando J. Derecho Administrativo. Teoría versus realidad. Interesse Público - IP, Belo Horizonte, n. 124, nov./dic. p. 113–122, 2020.
MURO, Sergio; CHEHTMAN, Alejandro; SILVA MÉNDEZ, Jorge; et al. Testing Representational Advantage in the Argentine Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Courts, Cambridge, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–23, 2018.
RODRÍGUEZ PRADO, Julieta. El procedimiento administrativo en la práctica. Principales cuestiones que se plantean. En: TAWIL, Guido S. (Dir.). Procedimiento administrativo. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot, 2010, p. 333–337.
ROMERO VERDÚN, Iván F. La anulación como deber, la selectividad anulatoria y la juridicidad. Revista Electrónica. Instituto de Investigaciones Ambrosio L. Gioja, Buenos Aires, n. 25, dic./may. p. 84–99, 2020. Disponible en:
<http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/revista-gioja/article/view/135>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iván Romero Verdún
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
.png){kind=logo}
