Sobre la irreductibilidad del debate entre teorías somáticas y cognitivas de las emociones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/topicos.v0i43.11894Palabras clave:
Cognición, emoción, incompatibilidad, valoraciónResumen
Durante las últimas décadas, se ha desarrollado un intenso debate en torno a la caracterización de las emociones en el que se perfilaron dos enfoques que se presentaban como incompatibles entre sí: la perspectiva somática y la perspectiva cognitiva de las emociones. En este trabajo me propongo evaluar si estas son en efecto posiciones irreconciliables, a partir de la sistematización de las tesis que le han dado identidad a cada una de estas perspectivas. Habiendo desarticulado algunos puntos de divergencia, finalmente, advierto en qué sentido considero que el debate se mantiene irreducible.
Citas
Arnold, M. (1960). Emotion and Personality. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barlassina, L., & Newen, A. (2014). “The Role of Bodily Perception in Emotion: In Defense of an Impure Somatic Theory”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(3), pp. 637–678.
Calvo, P., & Gomila, T. (2008). “Directions for and Embodied Cognitive Science: Toward an Integrated Approach”. En P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science. An Empodied Approach San Diego/Oxford/Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–25.
Charland, L. C. (1997). “Reconciling Cognitive and Perceptual Theories of Emotion: A Representational Proposal”. Philosophy of Science, 64(4), https://doi.org/10.1086/392572
Clore, G. L. (1994). “Why Emotions Are Never Unconscious”. En P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 285–290.
Colombetti, G. (2010). “Enaction, sense–making and emotion”. En J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, pp. 145–164.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
Ekman, P. (1977). “Biological and Cultural Contributions to Body and Facial Movement”. En J. Blacking (Ed.), The Anthropology of the Body. London: Academic Press, pp. 39–84.
Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R., & Bem, S. (2000). “The influence of emotions on beliefs”. En N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–9.
Frijda, N. H., & Zeelenberg, M. (2001). “Appraisal: What is the dependent?” En K. R. Scherer, K. R. Schorr, & T. Johnston (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–156.
Gazzaniga, M. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (1978). The Integrated Mind. New York: Plenum Press.
Goldie, P. (2000). The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration (Vol. 53). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, R. M. (1987). The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive Philosophy. Cambridge (Mass.): Cambridge University Press.
Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really are: The problem of psychological categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hacker, P. M. S. (2009). “The Conceptual Framework for the Investigation of Emotions”. En Y. Gustafsson, C. Kronqvist, & M. McEachrane (Eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hutchinson, P. (2009). Emotion–philosophy–science. En Y. Gustafsson, C. Kronqvist, & M. McEachrane (Eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
James, W. (1884). “What is an emotion?” Mind, 9, 188–205.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Chicago: Enciclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (1997). Neurociencia y conducta. Hoboken (N. J.): Prentice Hall.
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, Emotion, and Will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kenny, A. (1989). The Metaphysics of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lang, P. J. (1988). “What are the Data of Emotion?” En V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 173–191.
Lang, P. J. (2010). “Emotion and Motivation: Toward Consensus Definitions and a Common Research Purpose”. Emotion Review, 2(3), pp. 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910361984
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). “Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition”. American Psychologist, 37(9), pp. 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.9.1019
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). “On the primacy of cognition”. American Psychologist, 39(2), pp. 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S. (2001). “Relational Meaning and Discrete Emotions”. En K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–67.
LeDoux, J. E. (1994). “Emotional Processing, but Not Emotions, Can Occur Unconsciously”. En P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 291–292.
Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. R. (1987). “The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: A Functional Approach to a Semantic Controversy”. Cognition & Emotion, 1(1), pp. 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408361
Lewis, M. (2008). “The emergence of human emotions”. En M. Lewis, J. Haviland–Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, Third edition. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 304–319.
Lyons, W. (1980). Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, W. (1999). “The Philosophy of Cognition and Emotion”. En T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Chichester, (UK): Wiley, pp. 21–44.
Melamed, A. F. (2018). “Las emociones y su relación con la cognición: consideraciones sobre las objeciones de Anthony Kenny a las feeling theories”. Disputatio, 7 (8). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2550914
Moors, A. (2013). “On the causal role of appraisal in emotion”. Emotion Review, 5(2), pp. 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912463601
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). “Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development”. Emotion Review, 5(2), pp. 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
Pérez, D. I. (2013). Sentir, desear, creer. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.
Power, M. J., & Dalgleish, T. (2008). Cognition and Emotion: From Order to Disorder (2nd ed.). Hove (U.K.): Taylor & Francis.
Prinz, J. J. (2004). Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Prinz, J. J. (2005). “Are Emotions Feelings?” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), pp. 9–25.
Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge (Mass): The MIT Press.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State”. Psychological review, 69(5). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021465
Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J. J. (2007). “Same Situation—Different Emotions: How Appraisals Shape Our Emotions”. Emotion, 7(3), pp. 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.592
Solomon, R. C. (1973). “Emotions and Choice”. Review of Metaphisics, 28(1), pp. 20–41.
Solomon, R. C. (1976). The Passions: The Myth and Nature of Human Emotion. New York: Anchor Press, Doubleday.
Solomon, R. C. (2001). “Thoughts and Feelings: What Is a ‘Cognitive Theory’ of the Emotions, and Does It Neglect Affectivity?” En Not Passion’s Slave: Emotions and Choice, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–192.
Solomon, R. C. (2003). Not Passion’s Slave: Emotions and Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1965.tb01386.x
Wilson, J. R. S. (1972). Emotion and Object (Vol. 23). Cambridge (Mass.): Cambridge University Press.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). “Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences”. American Psychologist, 35(2), pp. 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). “On the Primacy of Affect”. American Psychologist, 39, pp. 117–123.
