Effect of crop sequence on water runoff and soil and herbicides losses.

Authors

  • M. S. SEEHAUS Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A.
  • M. C. SASAL Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A
  • N. VAN OPSTAL Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A.
  • E. A. GABIOUD Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A.
  • M. G. WILSON Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A.
  • A. WINGEYER Estación Experimental Paraná de I.N.T.A.
  • M. P. MICHLIG Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Técnicas (CONICET), C1033AAJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.  PRINARC, FIQ-UNL, Santiago del Estero 2654, C.P. 3000, Santa Fe, Argentina. 
  • M. R. REPETTI PRINARC, FIQ-UNL, Santiago del Estero 2654, C.P. 3000, Santa Fe, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14409/fa.v19i2.9750

Keywords:

agricultural systems, runoff, herbicides, precipitations

Abstract

Assessing agricultural systems effects on the environment is essential to minimize any negative impact. This study evaluates water, sediments and herbicides losses by runoff on different crop sequences due to a precipitation event following spraying of herbicides. Measurements were conducted in natural-rainfall runoff plots at INTA Paraná. Crop sequences were: soybean monoculture (S), soybean monoculture with wheat as cover crop (CC-S), and both wheat / soybean as cash crops (T / S). All sequences were sprayed with glyphosate and clethodim before soybean ́s sowing. Compared to the amount applied, the proportion of glyphosate and clethodim in runoff ranged between 5.3-13.5% and 2.6-5.9%, respectively. Losses of soil and AMPA (concentration) were greatest for S. The results highlight the importance of checking meteorological forecast conditions before spraying of herbicides to reduce nonpoint pollution of water bodies.

Published

2020-11-11

How to Cite

SEEHAUS, M. S., SASAL, M. C., VAN OPSTAL, N., GABIOUD, E. A., WILSON, M. G., WINGEYER, A., MICHLIG, M. P., & REPETTI, M. R. (2020). Effect of crop sequence on water runoff and soil and herbicides losses. FAVE Sección Ciencias Agrarias, 19(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.14409/fa.v19i2.9750