Practical problems in the execution of administrative sanctions: how to adequately deal with the administrative punitive power?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v9i2.10662Keywords:
Sanction, sanctioning power, enforceability, recourse, validityAbstract
The author focuses on the analysis and study of the practical problems that are generated at the moment in which the administration, after sanctioning, must specify such legal punishment in reality; In this regard, it opts for a careful analysis of the validity, effectiveness, of the administrative enforceability itself as well as of the recursive technique on the part of those who are affected by the public power holder of sanctioning powers in order to lead by good administration to the exercise of such powers of taxation of public administrations since there is a strong and solid distance between following neatly the formal path of sanctioning administrative activity compared to the wide space of punitive material activity, which leads to the fact that, in the real scenario, greater problems are caused to the administrative organization than those that have been generated by the subject subject to said public powers.
References
ARGENTINA. Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Universidad de Buenos Aires c/ Alicia Leonor Marra de Melincoff. Fallo 306:820.
BORDALÍ SALAMANCA, Andrés; FERRADA BÓRQUEZ, Juan Carlos, Las facultades juzgadoras de la administración: una involución en relación al principio clásico de la división de poderes. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), v. 13, n. 1, p. 187-205, 2002. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/JZBRmVi>.
CANO CAMPOS, Tomás. La ejecutividad de las sanciones y los enredos con la prescripción. Revista de Administración Pública, n. 212, p. 113-144, 2020. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/0ZBYcKv>.
MANTECA VALDELANDE, V. Las potestades administrativas: régimen general. Actualidad administrativa, n. 18, p. 5, 2011.
TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL DEL PERÚ. Sentencia recaída en el Expediente Nº 1803-2004-AA/TC. 2004. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/kZBIWIS>.
TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL DEL PERÚ. Sentencia recaída en el Expediente Nº 5514-2005-PA/TC. 2007. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/uZBIP4Q>.
TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL DEL PERÚ. Sentencia recaída en el Expediente Nº 01768-2009-PA/TC. 2010. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/zZBIHt1>.
TRIBUNAL ECONÓMICO-ADMINISTRATIVO CENTRAL DE ESPAÑA. Resolución Nº 00/3276/2006, fundamentos segundo y tercero, sobre suspensión de sanciones no tributarias. 07 de noviembre de 2007. Disponible en: <https://cutt.ly/kZBOel2>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 LUIS ALBERTO HUAMÁN ORDOÑEZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
.png){kind=logo}
